Reference for Bava Kamma 95:7
לימא פליגא אדרב דאמר רב הויא לה שלא תאכל
— I would answer that this teaching is in accordance with R. Tarfon, who held<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra p. 125. ');"><sup>9</sup></span> that the unusual damage occasioned by Horn in the plaintiff's premises has to be compensated in full: [Where the ox was brought in] with permission the case would therefore be one of Horn doing damage in the plaintiff's premises<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 270, n. 8. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jastrow
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy